Home Drug Charges

Drug Charges

A Guide to Methamphetamine Charges in the United States

A Guide to Methamphetamine Charges in the United States

What are Methamphetamine Charges?

Methamphetamine charges are components of the criminal procedure undertaken in order to substantiate an individual suspect’s required appearance within a legal venue subsequent to their arrest for criminal concerning the usage of Methamphetamine; Methamphetamine charges furnished by law enforcement agencies within the United States of America are required.
Due to the fact that they serve as a legally-documented account of the participation of an individual suspect with regard to illegal substances classified as illegal drugs or controlled substances. The implications latent with in Methamphetamine charges provide 2 primary legal facets, which express both the reasons for apprehension, as well as associate punitive recourse contingent upon a guilty verdict:
What is Methamphetamine?

Methamphetamine – oftentimes simply referred to as ‘Meth’ is a stimulant created by mixing a variety of legal and illegal amphetamines with various types of toxic and noxious chemicals, which range from over-the-counter antihistamines to controlled amphetamine
Methamphetamine charges primarily serve as an identification of illegal activity and events within which a suspect participated concerning the illegal substance Methamphetamine; the classification of these actions serve as not only gradients categorizing the events in question, but also as delineations between the various Methamphetamine charges in existence
Secondly, Methamphetamine charges serve to provide legal parameters existing in conjunction with the charges furnished by the arresting law enforcement agents; akin to the large majority of statutory legislation within the United States, the severity of Methamphetamine charges vary in accordance the degree of severity of the criminal activity undertaken

The Classification of Methamphetamine Charges under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970

Methamphetamine charges gained their legal solidification in conjunction to the passing of the Comprehensive Methamphetamine Control Act of 1996. Both the regulation of – as well as the punishment applicable to Methamphetamine charges rendering a verdict of ‘guilty’ upon a hearing within a legal venue exist under the jurisdiction of the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), which is a piece of legislation considered to be amongst the most primary component of the overarching legislative act entitled The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act – this act was passed under the Presidency of Richard Nixon on October 27th, 1970. The following legislation is furnished with regard to Methamphetamine charges:

Schedule II Substances and Methamphetamine Charges

Methamphetamine charges are furnished in accordance to the classification of the drug as a ‘Schedule II Substance’; the ideology implemented within the identification of a Schedule II substance expresses the following requirements contingent upon its classification:
A Schedule II substance is considered to retain an increased risk for addiction and abuse; with regard to Methamphetamine charges, this risk exists in conjunction to the addictive properties inherent within the chemical makeup of Methamphetamine
A Schedule II substance is considered to possess medical or health benefits with regard to its legitimate and authorized usage; unless the individual suspect is in receipt of such permission – requiring both federal and medical authorization, Methamphetamine charges may be applicable through the misuse of Methamphetamine
A Schedule II substance is considered retain an increased risk of dependence on a several physiological levels ranging from psychological to physical in nature

A Guide to OxyContin Charges in the United States

A Guide to OxyContin Charges in the United States

What are OxyContin Charges?

OxyContin is defined as a chemical opiate; in conjunction to the chemical properties latent within naturally occurring opiates, such as opium and Heroin, OxyContin is prescribed in order to provide for the relief of severe pain with regard to its intake –however, OxyContin is a specific, non-generic pharmaceutical, which is manufactured by Purdue Pharmaceuticals. 
In many cases – due to its popularity, OxyContin is commonly used as an unofficial catchall term for Oxycode, which is the generic chemical component providing the drug with its physiological effects. Akin to all strains of Oxycode, OxyContin exists as a binding opitate, which allows for multiple chemicals to reside within single molecules inherent within synthetic opiates:

The Legality of OxyContin Charges

OxyContin charges are components of the criminal procedure undertaken in order to substantiate an individual suspect’s required appearance within a legal venue subsequent to their arrest for criminal concerning the OxyContin; OxyContin charges furnished by law enforcement agencies within the United States of America are required, due to the fact that they serve as a legally-documented account of the participation of an individual suspect with regard to illegal substances classified as illegal drugs or controlled substances. 

The Determination of OxyContin Charges


The implications latent with in OxyContin charges provide 2 primary legal facets, which express both the reasons for apprehension, as well as associate punitive recourse contingent upon a guilty verdict:
OxyContin charges primarily serve as an identification of illegal activity and events within which a suspect participated concerning the illegal substance OxyContin
Secondly, OxyContin charges serve to provide legal parameters existing in conjunction with the charges furnished by the arresting law enforcement agents
The Classification of OxyContin Charges under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970
Both the regulation of – as well as the punishment applicable to OxyContin charges rendering a verdict of ‘guilty’ upon a hearing within a legal venue exist under the jurisdiction of the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), which is a piece of legislation considered to be amongst the most primary component of the overarching legislative act entitled The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act – this act was passed under the Presidency of Richard Nixon on October 27th, 1970:
Schedule I Substance and OxyContin Charges

OxyContin charges are furnished in accordance to the classification of the drug following its review during the Narcotic Drug Convention of 1961; as a ‘Schedule I Substance’, both the ideology implemented within the identification of a Schedule I substance expresses the following requirements contingent upon its classification:
A Schedule I substance is considered to retain an increased risk for addiction and abuse; with regard to OxyContin charges, this risk exists in conjunction to the addictive properties inherent within the chemical makeup of OxyContin
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of any or all medical or productive usages; in contrast with certain illegal drugs, OxyContin is not considered to retain any medical or health benefits upon its usage
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of specified or identifiable terms, conditions, or guidelines with regard to safety measures concerning its usage – as a result, Schedule I substances are considered to retain high proclivities for overdose

A Guide to Steroids Charges in the United States

A Guide to Steroids Charges in the United States

What are Steroids Charges?
Steroids charges are components of the criminal procedure undertaken in order to substantiate an individual suspect’s required appearance within a legal venue subsequent to their arrest for criminal concerning the usage of Steroids. 
Anabolic Steroids, which are largely used with regard to their chemical property stimulating physical performance and muscle growth, range in punitive recourse; in most cases, the variation in sentencing will result from the individual nature, rate, and quantity of Steroid use. 
The chemicals found in Anabolic Steroids are observed as closely mirroring the physiology of male hormones naturally occurring in the male body; as a result of the supplemental introduction of hormones, users may experience stimulated muscle growth and performance enhancement:
On one hand steroid usage may result in the implementation of Federal criminal charges, resulting in heavy fines and incarceration – this type of classification is common within professional athletics; on the other hand, private and minimal steroid use may simply result in the imposition of fines – however, the physical devastation resulting from any type of steroid usage is considered to be catastrophic
Both the regulation of – as well as the punishment applicable to Steroids charges rendering a verdict of ‘guilty’ upon a hearing within a legal venue exist under the jurisdiction of the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), which is a piece of legislation considered to be amongst the most primary component of the overarching legislative act entitled The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act – this act was passed under the Presidency of Richard Nixon on October 27th, 1970
The Classification of Steroids Charges under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970
Located in Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, the Controlled Substance Act addresses and classifies the illegal usage, sales, and cultivation undertaken with regard to the wide range of individual substances considered to be illegal both in nature, as well as upon misuse or unauthorized possession. 
Steroids charges furnished by the CSA not only provide a legislative classification of the drug itself, but also the parameters within which prosecution concerning Steroids required adherence. The following legislation is furnished with regard to Steroids charges; these charges were determined on February of 1991:
Schedule III Substances and Steroids Charges


Steroids charges are furnished in accordance to the classification of the drug as a ‘Schedule III Substance’; the ideology implemented within the identification of a Schedule III substance expresses the following requirements contingent upon its classification:
A Schedule III substance is considered to retain a considerable risk for addiction and abuse; however, this risk is considered to exist to a lesser degree than both Schedule I and Schedule II substances
A Schedule III substance is considered to possess medical or health benefits with regard to its legitimate and authorized usage; unless the individual suspect is in receipt of such permission – requiring both federal and medical authorization, Steroids charges may be applicable through the misuse of Steroids
A Schedule III substance is considered retain a considerable degree of potential physiological dependence; as a result, Steroids charges are largely less severe than those associated with Schedule I and Schedule II substances

A Guide to Crack Charges in the United States

A Guide to Crack Charges in the United States

What are Crack Charges?

Crack charges are components of the criminal procedure undertaken in order to substantiate an individual suspect’s required appearance within a legal venue subsequent to their arrest for criminal concerning the use of Crack-Cocaine; oftentimes simply referred to as ‘Crack’, Crack is a form of Cocaine that has typically undergone synthetic alteration – in contrast to pure Cocaine, Crack will largely be processed with binding chemicals such as baking powder or salt in order to maximize smaller amounts of pure Cocaine:
Crack charges furnished by law enforcement agencies within the United States of America are required, due to the fact that they serve as a legally documented account of the participation of an individual suspect with regard to illegal substances classified as illegal drugs or controlled substances
The implications latent with in Crack charges provide 2 primary legal facets, which express both the reasons for apprehension, as well as associate punitive recourse contingent upon a guilty verdict – both the events required in order to render Crack Charges, as well as the applicable sentencing following judicial review
Crack charges primarily serve as an identification of illegal activity and events within which a suspect participated concerning the illegal substance Crack; the classification of these actions serve as not only gradients categorizing the events in question, but also as delineations between the various Crack charges in existence

The Classification of Crack Charges under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970

Located in Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, the Controlled Substance Act addresses and classifies the illegal usage, sales, and cultivation undertaken with regard to the wide range of individual substances considered to be illegal both in nature, as well as upon misuse or unauthorized possession. Crack charges furnished by the CSA not only provide a legislative classification of the drug itself, but also the parameters within which prosecution concerning Crack required adherence. The following legislation is furnished with regard to Crack charges:
Schedule I Substance and Crack Charges

Akin to Cocaine Charges determined through the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914, Crack charges are furnished in accordance to the classification of the drug as a ‘Schedule I Substance’ – the ideology implemented within the identification of a Schedule I substance expresses the following requirements contingent upon its classification:
A Schedule I substance is considered to retain an increased risk for addiction and abuse; with regard to Crack charges, this risk exists in conjunction to the addictive properties inherent within the chemical makeup of Crack
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of any or all medical or productive usages; in contrast with certain illegal drugs, Crack is not considered to retain any medical or health benefits upon its usage
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of specified or identifiable terms, conditions, or guidelines with regard to safety measures concerning its usage – as a result, Schedule I substances are considered to retain high proclivities for overdose

A Guide to Ecstasy Charges in the United States

A Guide to Ecstasy Charges in the United States

What are Ecstasy Charges?
Ecstasy, which is a colloquialism used for the identification of MDMA or 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine is classified as a recreational or ‘party’ drug typically taken as a result of its tendency to elicit euphoric and intoxicating feelings within the user; however, the use of Ecstasy has also been linked to a variety of illnesses, diseases, and untimely death.
The regulation of Ecstasy took place in 1988 through an Amendment to the Controlled Substance Act (CSA), which is a piece of legislation considered to be amongst the most primary component of the overarching legislative act entitled The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act – this act was passed under the Presidency of Richard Nixon on October 27th, 1970:
Ecstasy charges primarily serve as an identification of illegal activity and events within which a suspect participated concerning the illegal substance Ecstasy; the classification of these actions serve as not only gradients categorizing the events in question, but also as delineations between the various Ecstasy charges in existence – both the possession of key ingredients and components concerning the manufacturing of Ecstasy typically mirror the charges applicable to possession of the drug itself
Secondly, Ecstasy charges serve to provide legal parameters existing in conjunction with the charges furnished by the arresting law enforcement agents; akin to the large majority of statutory legislation within the United States, the severity of Ecstasy charges vary in accordance the degree of severity of the criminal activity undertaken
The Classification of Ecstasy Charges under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970

Located in Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, the Controlled Substance Act addresses and classifies the illegal usage, sales, and cultivation undertaken with regard to the wide range of individual substances considered to be illegal both in nature, as well as upon misuse or unauthorized possession. 
Ecstasy charges furnished by the CSA not only provide a legislative classification of the drug itself, but also the parameters within which prosecution concerning Ecstasy required adherence. The following legislation is furnished with regard to Ecstasy charges:

Schedule I Substance and Ecstasy Charges

Ecstasy charges are furnished in accordance to the classification of the drug as a ‘Schedule I Substance’; the ideology implemented within the identification of a Schedule I substance expresses the following requirements contingent upon its classification:
A Schedule I substance is considered to retain an increased risk for addiction and abuse; with regard to Ecstasy charges, this risk exists in conjunction to the addictive properties inherent within the chemical makeup of Ecstasy
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of any or all medical or productive usages; in contrast with certain illegal drugs, Ecstasy is not considered to retain any medical or health benefits upon its usage
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of specified or identifiable terms, conditions, or guidelines with regard to safety measures concerning its usage – as a result, Schedule I substances are considered to retain high proclivities for overdose

A Guide to Cocaine Charges in the United States

A Guide to Cocaine Charges in the United States

What are Cocaine Charges?

Cocaine charges are components of the criminal procedure undertaken in order to substantiate an individual suspect’s required appearance within a legal venue subsequent to their arrest for criminal concerning the usage of Cocaine; Cocaine charges furnished by law enforcement agencies within the United States of America are required, due to the fact that they serve as a legally-documented account of the participation of an individual suspect with regard to illegal substances classified as illegal drugs or controlled substances. 
The implications latent with in Cocaine charges provide 2 primary legal facets, which express both the reasons for apprehension, as well as associate punitive recourse contingent upon a guilty verdict:
What is Cocaine?

Cocaine is derived from the Coca leaf found on the Coca plant; the leaf is dried, pulverized, and reduced to powder form – although the Coca Leaf is considered to be naturally occurring in its most pure form, Cocaine typically synthetically altered:
Cocaine charges primarily serve as an identification of illegal activity and events within which a suspect participated concerning the illegal substance Cocaine; the classification of these actions serve as not only gradients categorizing the events in question, but also as delineations between the various Cocaine charges in existence
Secondly, Cocaine charges serve to provide legal parameters existing in conjunction with the charges furnished by the arresting law enforcement agents; akin to the large majority of statutory legislation within the United States, the severity of Cocaine charges vary in accordance the degree of severity of the criminal activity undertaken


The Classification of Cocaine Charges under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970
Located in Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, the Controlled Substance Act addresses and classifies the illegal usage, sales, and cultivation undertaken with regard to the wide range of individual substances considered to be illegal both in nature, as well as upon misuse or unauthorized possession. 
Cocaine charges furnished by the CSA not only provide a legislative classification of the drug itself, but also the parameters within which prosecution concerning Cocaine required adherence. Cocaine charges underwent legal determination in conjunction with the passing of the Harrison Narcotics Act passed in 1914 – the following legislation is furnished with regard to Cocaine charges:


Schedule I Substance and Cocaine Charges

Cocaine charges are furnished in accordance to the classification of the drug as a ‘Schedule I Substance’; the ideology implemented within the identification of a Schedule I substance expresses the following requirements contingent upon its classification:
A Schedule I substance is considered to retain an increased risk for addiction and abuse; with regard to Cocaine charges, this risk exists in conjunction to the addictive properties inherent within the chemical makeup of Cocaine
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of any or all medical or productive usages; in contrast with certain illegal drugs, Cocaine is not considered to retain any medical or health benefits upon its usage
A Schedule I substance is considered to be absent of specified or identifiable terms, conditions, or guidelines with regard to safety measures concerning its usage – as a result, Schedule I substances are considered to retain high proclivities for overdose